 |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
|
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 06/10/2011 08:02 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Mark Woodward wrote: >> Actually, yes. I use OTR myself. The connection piece, of course, needs >> to propagate the key from the IM to email and web browser. > Oh, wait. By "private" you mean "anonymous"? Well, actually there are two things that encryption can provide by definition: (1) Secure communications. (2) Verified communications. Anonymous communications, not so much. OTR encrypts an IM TCP stream so that agents between the two end points shouldn't be able to read the data. > --Rich P. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
