Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 08/26/2011 11:40 PM, jk_xtblug at kinz.org wrote: > Thats true for you and I and this community, but the legal community > and the medical community still rely on faxes for "security". (Or > something.... ) I can't send an email to the court clerk as an > official document. It has to be faxed, or physically delivered. Many > Doctors will not accept email for liability reasons attributed to > HIPAA and SarBox issues. Real reason or not, they will accept faxes. > Yes, some doctors will do email but they are not the issue. My health > insurance insists on faxed forms. Unfortunately, the legal community has not really accepted digital signatures. Certainly, email has made a big impact on just about everyone, people still cannot scan/email a legal document to an attorney, the courts, pharmacies etc. Faxes and fax machines are still important in business and legal. Years ago (1980s) I worked on a system for the Mass. university library system where we set up scanners and PCs (eg 286) systems to transmit fax data between the libraries. Most of these libraries had our system and a very underutilized communications network. The system worked. If you went to a library and needed a research paper that was in another library, the librarian at the other end would scan it in. The issues we had were: 1. The document scanning had to be done in the same time frame as on a copier. (eg. librarian time). This was hard to do with the old 286 systems. 2. Some of the libraries only had faxes, so we had to manage the phone lines as well as the comms line. Actually the comms system was complicated because it used a different protocol that we had to write. All in all it worked but not great because of crappy equipment. When I was at Digital we also had a fax mail system. The issue I might raise here for Jeff is the acceptance by the legal community. Will they accept as a legal document a document that is 1. faxed to a fax mail system (as you have descripted) 2. faxed from a fax mail system to a real fax machine 3. Can we eliminate the fax machine altogether. The barrier to this is acceptance by the legal system and the courts. Properly encrypted/signed email is IMHO, more secure than faxing over telco (assuming proper procedures are set up for encryption/signing). So, technically your idea is very good, but once developed can you sell it to the legal community. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |