Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 2/18/2012 11:33 PM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: >> On 2/18/2012 10:45 PM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: >>> If you are saying that a catastrophic failure of a storage device does >>> not >>> reflect poorly upon the manufacturer, I suggest you rethink your >>> position. >>> >>> If I were driving home in a Kia and it died with no symptoms, i.e. was >>> running perfectly with no "check engine" light as well as properly >>> maintained, would you NOT blame the manufacturer? >> If a Kia went for $100, I'd buy two in case one died unexpectedly. > No a Kia wont go for $100, so your analogy is flawed. And you're trying to compare a $15,000+ vehicle with warranty and maintenance schedule to a hard drive you purchased online for $129. Even so, catastrophic things happen, and the manufacturer isn't always to blame when something goes wrong. Parts die unexpectedly for varying reasons. A car usually be repaired and put back on the road. Hard drives can't.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |