Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:51:56PM -0400, john saylor wrote: > without unions don't conditions for workers just get worse? Do they? I have never been unionized, and my working conditions have either remained the same or improved over the 20 years or so I've been working in technology, depending on your perspective and niggling details... > and do you enjoy weekends? you can thank unions for that. Great case in point. My mom, who I was just mentioning worked for unions her whole life, pretty much always had to work Saturday. Whereas I, never a union worker, have never had to, other than very rare and special circumsances (discounting my pre-degree employment in retail, which makes most of its money on the weekend, even when it happens to be unionized, e.g. Stop 'n Shop). The one and only job my mom had where she was always treated fairly and never had a legitimate grievance against her employer was non-union. > hasn't wealth been accumulating more and more in fewer and fewer > hands? Sure, but: > isn't the union movement on life support in this country? I don't know, is it? Do you have any statistics that correlate loss of spending power of the average household to a downturn in union participation? > do you think there's a connection here? No, I don't, but I haven't seen any numbers to support either conclusion. > The number of people in poverty in 2010 (46.2 million) is the > largest number in the 52 years for which poverty estimates have been > published. > [from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/about/overview/index.html] First let's clarify: you mean in the USA, specifically. Is that true world-wide? China and India have been rapidly developing economies for some years now, and combined contain the majority of the world's population. So, taking into account local differences in what is called poverty, is it more, or less? I'm not so sure... Now we'll go ahead and consider USA, specifically. Do you think it's at all possible that the cause of this is something other than the decline of unions (which I don't think is proven, and tend to doubt)? Could it perhaps be that globalization and the high price of American labor has priced us out of manufacturing and other industry sectors? Or perhaps other factors? > how do workers stand up for their rights without unions? I did say that unions, at a certain stage, serve a useful purpose. The problem is that, as with all entities involving humans, once they attain a certain level of power, they become corrupt and abuse their power, and at that point cease to be a force for good. They do very little for the workers that need it the most (like my mom), and do too much in the defense of poor workers who don't deserve to be defended (like the police officer in her town who was found sleeping at home when he was supposed to be on duty). -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |