BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Linux file systems
- Subject: [Discuss] Linux file systems
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 19:39:12 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53334506.2020506@gmail.com>
- References: <1395861029.5444.YahooMailNeo@web122205.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4cfb4df8a2b02b85964f545dad3a924c.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <53334506.2020506@gmail.com>
Tom Metro wrote: > My general advice is to stick with the default file systems recommended > by your distribution, unless you have special requirements. If you are I very, very strongly recommend against doing this. Many Linux distributions default to ext4. This is... a poor choice. ext4 is unstable, it's buggy, the recovery tools (fsck, etc) are lacking, it has no backup tools, it's impossible to back out once an extent is used, and so forth. If you're going to use any of the ext file systems then use ext3. A better option is a small ext2 boot partition and either XFS or JFS for everything else. I give the nod to XFS since Red Hat is backing it as their preferred file system in RHEL7. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Linux file systems
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] Linux file systems
- References:
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: aldo_albanese at yahoo.com (aldo albanese)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Linux file systems
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Linux file systems
- Next by Date: [Discuss] free crm for nonprofits
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Linux file systems
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Linux file systems
- Index(es):