BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Subject: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 13:02:02 -0400
- In-reply-to: <536A61F9.5000507@gmail.com>
- References: <5364F3FB.40707@blu.org> <5367AE30.5020205@borg.org> <5367B2A9.3090804@gmail.com> <5367E6E2.7050005@borg.org> <5367EB97.5070501@gmail.com> <536801C9.9030407@borg.org> <697921c8eefc4fde8852a86b2e2f3e12@CO2PR04MB684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CAJFsZ=p22nncGGD3WWxv-PNsOv1chxTBZjmaL-ao465WVazgdg@mail.gmail.com> <f4147adc648047bdb6851ca347856d80@CO2PR04MB684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <20140507144404.GG26127@randomstring.org> <536A61F9.5000507@gmail.com>
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Richard Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote: > Dan Ritter wrote: >> 3Ware tw_cli man page: >> >> Verify activity attempts to verify all units based on their unit >> type. Verifying RAID-1 involves checking that both drives contain the > > It doesn't work reliably. If the data is corrupted somewhere in the > controller itself (flakey cache for example) then the checksums will be > correct but the data that is written and checked is wrong. I've had a > 3Ware controller do this to me. All of the checksums matched up but the > data was damaged prior to the calculations and writes. Correctly written > and replicated wrong data is still wrong data. :P And checksums can be incorrectly generated/verified by any hardware at any time. I claim that 100% data integrity is impossible. I don't think even ZFS can guarantee 100% data integrity with the right set of bizarre hardware failures in the CPU/RAM of the computer. Pointing out that all hardware can have errors is kind of a moot point. More important is being able to assess what kinds of hardware/software failures can result in loss of integrity (or data) and their relative probabilities. Bill Bogstad
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- References:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Index(es):