BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Subject: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:37:13 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53FB9E7A.5030808@gmail.com>
- References: <53F9F6B9.4060505@stephenadler.com> <20140824161132.GE14848@randomstring.org> <be314521ab6bebb6add54d706b042f01.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <53FA1C3B.70908@gmail.com> <53FB19E5.4080602@aeminium.org> <53FB4A5D.2030305@gmail.com> <CA+h9Qs5GnC6d1ejBQC=crtHwxoDiFWo4Kn+xjt0eiA8Kr733_A@mail.gmail.com> <53FB70E6.50706@gmail.com> <CA+h9Qs5THPNEir7tLZNjzLWMpod=9UGWTSCeZS2nCwVY0Ox=-w@mail.gmail.com> <53FB7F0A.40105@gmail.com> <253113e101a6fc1b75e160dfbd3d0dbe.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <53FB9325.9010200@gmail.com> <a7c1366d330261e2ee4906c8d08d0b94.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <53FB9E7A.5030808@gmail.com>
> On 8/25/2014 3:55 PM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: >> No security can withstand privileged access. > > True, but with PKI and escrow a single attack can silently compromise > the entire domain in one go. *any* shared or distributed authority has the same issue. > > -- > Rich P. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- References:
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: nuno at aeminium.org (Nuno Sucena Almeida)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] vnc
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Draft document from NIST about SSH in an automated environment
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Index(es):
