BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:19:06 -0700
- In-reply-to: <mailman.1660.1410465487.560.discuss@blu.org>
- References: <mailman.1660.1410465487.560.discuss@blu.org>
Someone noted: > I'm yet to see anyone convincingly defend systemd. I love a good Linux religious debate, er, war. It's a great way to celebrate the 13th anniversary of 9/11: Linux and SysV init are now 13 years older (as are each of us), we're still fighting the "terrorists" and the jihadis are falsely citing religion as motivation for their take-no-prisoners it's-my-highway approach to subjugating whomever they can get control over. But upon reflection, I'm not quite sure which one is the terrorist, which one is the defender of liberty, and which one is the neutral bystander: sysV init, upstart, or systemd? To me, it looks like systemd has won this war (admittedly, its advocates have blown up the others' temples) and it's time to move on to more-important things. Yet it's been a fun debate! -rich
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Index(es):