BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:05:22 -0400
- In-reply-to: <32107a3b81f57252cdcc1537b109fca6.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
- References: <mailman.1660.1410465487.560.discuss@blu.org> <32107a3b81f57252cdcc1537b109fca6.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
On 9/11/2014 6:19 PM, Rich Braun wrote: > But upon reflection, I'm not quite sure which one is the terrorist, which one > is the defender of liberty, and which one is the neutral bystander: sysV > init, upstart, or systemd? The problem with this question is that it's the same loaded question that was on the Debian TC ballot. Which is to say that System V init is presented as irreparably broken, hating Canonical is an in thing for the Debian community, OpenRC is BSD-style which Debian abandoned many years ago, and that leaves systemd as the only viable choice on the list. Personally, I don't see System V init as being irreparably broken. Or in fact broken at all. And I don't see any of the alternatives as being objectively better. They're better at some things but at the cost of being worse at others. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Index(es):