BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:29:26 -0400
- In-reply-to: <li6a9669ml8.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
- References: <5411058F.6010208@gmail.com> <li6a9669ml8.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Mike Small <smallm at panix.com> wrote: > 5. I'm yet to see anyone convincingly defend systemd. Some of the > critiques are quite overheated, but the "myths debunked" always read as > bald face advocacy I found one blog that seems to have a history of level-headed advocacy for systemd without insulting people or SysV Init (says it isn't badly broken). It's not by a SystemD DEV but by a working sysadmin. http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/linux/SystemdWhyItWon?showcomments & http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/linux/SystemdRight -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- References:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Dan Geer's Blackhat talk, iGuardian "enterprise-grade" home router
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Index(es):