BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: michael.tiernan at gmail.com (Michael Tiernan)
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:19:24 -0400
- In-reply-to: <li6a9669ml8.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
- References: <5411058F.6010208@gmail.com> <li6a9669ml8.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
On 9/11/14 11:57 AM, Mike Small wrote: > I guess it can't lazy load dbus since it's intertwined with that (so much > it so that it wants it in the kernel -- as my son says... what the?) I've always been irked by the overly complex interdependencies that have been getting more and more introduced into the systems. Try to build a stripped down system for a specific purpose and watch what happens when you try to take out crap that isn't needed because it expands the surface area for security holes and isn't needed. As I remember the first time I ran into this was trying to install a simple tool and finding that it required installing a few X11 parts which dragged an entire desktop environment into the picture. None of the ancillary stuff was required for the tool to do it's job, it was just because the package was poorly built. To me, this is the same as the systemd approach. (okay, squint a bit.) -- << MCT >> Michael C Tiernan. http://www.linkedin.com/in/mtiernan Non Impediti Ratione Cogatationis Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea. -Robert A. Heinlein
- References:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by Date: [Discuss] iGuardian "enterprise-grade" home router
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Index(es):