BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] systemd explanations
- Subject: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:59:22 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20160219004630.44668069@mydesk.domain.cxm>
- References: <56C53172.2010709@riseup.net> <chxmvqyeztx.fsf@iceland.freeshell.org> <20160218123628.1f963b58@mydesk.domain.cxm> <56C60772.7040309@gmail.com> <20160219004630.44668069@mydesk.domain.cxm>
On 2/19/2016 12:46 AM, Steve Litt wrote: > Go on any Linux **USER GROUP** mailing list, and *BSD is seen as a close > cousin. This is likely true. > Yeah, RMS and Linus can be dicks, but I don't think the entire > GNU/Linux community should be judged on their actions. You are technically correct: we should not be judged by their actions. We should be judged by our actions. Or inaction. By allowing or encouraging RMS and Linus to continue being dicks in their roles as leaders and speakers for the GNU and Linux communities, we grant them tacit approval for their behavior. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- References:
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)
- [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Next by Date: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Next by thread: [Discuss] systemd explanations
- Index(es):
