BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Subject: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:54:49 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAAbKA3Xt8swHHY-7wBEmtVaHAcmPGHs12nFpD3GczV78gQWGJw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <56F9C8F4.8070407@gmail.com> <CAAbKA3Xt8swHHY-7wBEmtVaHAcmPGHs12nFpD3GczV78gQWGJw@mail.gmail.com>
If the world were magically to switch to Open Source Everything, assuming physical security, is there an argument that this is somehow insecure -- that some code needs to be secret in order for it to be secure? Chip fabs, hardware designs, missiles, attack systems, radar, networks, nuclear and energy systems etc. Or, with proper encryption and key-based systems implemented does the openness of the system not imply weakness, beyond unknown vulnerabilities?
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- References:
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] issue with mysql in a VM on Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Index(es):