BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Subject: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:55:30 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAAbKA3Xt8swHHY-7wBEmtVaHAcmPGHs12nFpD3GczV78gQWGJw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <56F9C8F4.8070407@gmail.com> <CAAbKA3Xt8swHHY-7wBEmtVaHAcmPGHs12nFpD3GczV78gQWGJw@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/29/2016 1:48 AM, Bill Ricker wrote: > ?(And this wasn't even the SBS's operational phone, it was his work > phone, so it's still just posturing. They'll be back when they have > something else they think public opinion might back them on.)? The FBI's choice of case and approach have caused my incipient paranoia to start blooming, and I'm wondering when someone is going to say "Ignore that man behind the curtain". I supposed alleged terrorists aren't likely to draw much public sympathy, but the FBI has always been the most savvy of the federal agencies when it comes to self-promotion, and picking a fight with Apple just doesn't seem like good PR to me. It might be that someone at the NSA has a score to settle at the Hoover building, and the FBI heard deafening silence when they asked the Puzzle Palace to take a look in the iPhone they seized, but to go against Apple - in an election year, no less - strikes me as currying the wrong sort of favor. I suppose there's a wheel within this wheel: perhaps someone with a finger in the FBI's budget pie wanted to strong-arm a hefty campaign contribution from Apple. It's also possible that Apple's execs wanted some free ink and to boost the iPhone's reputation for security, and that everyone inside the beltway knew how this would play out months ago. Still, it's too easy to assume a hidden puppeteer when trying to explain confusing events, so I'm trying to find some logical reason for the imbroglio that doesn't require underhanded back-room deals. However, the contradictions pile up faster than the logical conclusions: 1. If the FBI were trying to slide a software version of the Clipper chip through the back door (pun intended), then they'd have to be aware that Apple could just code around it with the next point release of IOS. 2. If the Hooverites thought they could establish a legal precedent which would obligate any firm to provide free software design, testing, coding, and support at their whim, then their bureaucratic compass needs to be realigned: it's pointing in a direction that Americans no longer want to go, and which not even right wing conservatives want them to choose. 3. If the San Bernardino shootings have become a way to test the political winds, that means this trial balloon is made of lead: nobody I can think of wants the FBI to have access to their secrets. The fact that Hoover routinely blackmailed members of Congress to build the foundation which his marble edifice rests on has got to weighing heavily in any decision - again, in an election year - that lawmakers would make. 4. I suppose the FBI might be currying favor with TheDonald, and hoping that whomever gets elected would remember them as being tough on terror. Still, I get the feeling that we're all being sent to find a broomstick. Bill
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- References:
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Index(es):