BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Subject: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:03:45 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CANaytceMKnL_aQEf7UFRyO7asFebFRow4dwKiB=43PrX9od9fg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <56F9C8F4.8070407@gmail.com> <CAAbKA3Xt8swHHY-7wBEmtVaHAcmPGHs12nFpD3GczV78gQWGJw@mail.gmail.com> <CANaytceMKnL_aQEf7UFRyO7asFebFRow4dwKiB=43PrX9od9fg@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/29/2016 10:54 AM, Greg Rundlett (freephile) wrote: > If the world were magically to switch to Open Source Everything, > assuming physical security, is there an argument that this is somehow > insecure -- that some code needs to be secret in order for it to be > secure? Chip fabs, hardware designs, missiles, attack systems, > radar, networks, nuclear and energy systems etc. None of this matters. Secret or open, attackers always have the option to attack security systems in ways they were not designed to defend. This is the attacker's advantage. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- From: greg at freephile.com (Greg Rundlett (freephile))
- [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Strange sendmail (and postfix) spam issue: accepting fail "from" myself?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Strange sendmail (and postfix) spam issue: accepting fail "from" myself?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Encrypt Everything? Good Luck With That
- Index(es):