BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- Subject: [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 14:06:25 -0400
- In-reply-to: <570A9474.3000502@riseup.net>
- References: <1E33A4DC-8FF0-4688-87B6-9C61D8AC45CA@icloud.com> <5709B38B.6030007@gmail.com> <570A858A.7030605@riseup.net> <570A8B11.2070902@gmail.com> <570A9474.3000502@riseup.net>
On 4/10/2016 1:59 PM, IngeGNUe wrote: > That would be fine if you didn't lump in software freedom supporters > with RMS adherents. I don't. If you don't support RMS's goals then you're not an adherent. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- From: eric.chadbourne at icloud.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- From: ingegnue at riseup.net (IngeGNUe)
- [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] licensing: who freakin cares?
- Index(es):
