BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Subject: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: grg-webvisible+blu at ai.mit.edu (grg)
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:11:36 -0400
- In-reply-to: <b4d055c5-7a90-114f-6d5c-5a7294f23d8c@gmail.com>
- References: <CAAbKA3VUy0bfzURkPY-Ys0iXwk0bgn4wwD0Nd5JceR9ULTNkiQ@mail.gmail.com> <bd135daf-6684-0a43-7ab8-082c4d469a69@gmail.com> <sjm4ls6u0np.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <0a2b0620-8114-92cf-eb53-79be94a1f0be@gmail.com> <20170913154439.55F40141AF3@localhost> <eae97232-36e0-2f59-75b1-257f4aa28957@gmail.com> <20170913192346.fv2czdyetmh6fpaa@randomstring.org> <b1e32d76-3b77-20e2-0a7f-75a02c1f906e@gmail.com> <20170914021345.B0A9E143438@localhost> <b4d055c5-7a90-114f-6d5c-5a7294f23d8c@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:36:40PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: > On 9/13/2017 10:13 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote: > > This is 1000Base-T, with standard cat 5e cable. scp isn't much slower. > > You're using full-duplex with Cat 5e? You're off spec. And now I'm > wondering if the data corruption problems you were having a few weeks > ago were a consequence of it. Which spec are you referring to? Please cite your source. FWIW (some, but never the definitive answer) Wikipedia disagrees with you: "Each 1000BASE-T network segment can be a maximum length of 100 meters (330 feet), and must use Category 5 cable or better (including Cat 5e and Cat 6)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet#1000BASE-T So with 5e he's actually a grade above the minimum cat5. (Note the top of that article says that full duplex is used exclusively, so they're not talking about half duplex operation over cat5 or 5e or cat6.) --grg
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- References:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Index(es):