BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Subject: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: cra at WPI.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 09:18:26 -0400
- In-reply-to: <b4d055c5-7a90-114f-6d5c-5a7294f23d8c@gmail.com>
- References: <CAAbKA3VUy0bfzURkPY-Ys0iXwk0bgn4wwD0Nd5JceR9ULTNkiQ@mail.gmail.com> <bd135daf-6684-0a43-7ab8-082c4d469a69@gmail.com> <sjm4ls6u0np.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <0a2b0620-8114-92cf-eb53-79be94a1f0be@gmail.com> <20170913154439.55F40141AF3@localhost> <eae97232-36e0-2f59-75b1-257f4aa28957@gmail.com> <20170913192346.fv2czdyetmh6fpaa@randomstring.org> <b1e32d76-3b77-20e2-0a7f-75a02c1f906e@gmail.com> <20170914021345.B0A9E143438@localhost> <b4d055c5-7a90-114f-6d5c-5a7294f23d8c@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:36:40PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: > On 9/13/2017 10:13 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote: > > This is 1000Base-T, with standard cat 5e cable. scp isn't much slower. > > You're using full-duplex with Cat 5e? You're off spec. And now I'm > wondering if the data corruption problems you were having a few weeks > ago were a consequence of it. No you're just wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_5_cable https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet#1000BASE-T And no one uses 1000BASE-TX. It is a dead technology. 1000BASE-T practically only runs full-duplex. The half-duplex variant is a dead technology.
- References:
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
- Index(es):
