BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- Subject: [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 16:07:13 +0000
- In-reply-to: <CAAbKA3WJDVYEMpWtjimLYWVUroP25z2+=52+5tRK9rH2b9VFrQ@mail.gmail.com> (Bill Ricker's message of "Sat, 12 May 2018 14:09:28 -0400")
- References: <79527c22-26cd-3899-56b4-0b13b4a58930@gmail.com> <20180508200520.d35fenmwacnfn3hl@randomstring.org> <55e7296b-55f7-581a-14f2-9766d72f6008@gmail.com> <5edeab53-b933-a343-a5dd-8cca99276031@millermicro.com> <8e5f9d03-d3f7-732e-91f3-2ada7f56a45c@gmail.com> <chxbmdp3su1.fsf@sdf.org> <S69gwRhfmCaZUZfHHL_vc_fk941cn02uo0-0t1GhDHUQBG3o0yV09lAuhCcmg_3z4596fuK1iGn0ipd1aWOxpRyy9TFTYynU8Icdx7y-KL0=@protonmail.com> <CAAbKA3WJDVYEMpWtjimLYWVUroP25z2+=52+5tRK9rH2b9VFrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> writes: ... > *BSD is great for servers. As a "former" Security type, I respect OpenBSD's > commitment to security out of the Box. A recent client had a mix of Centos > and *BSD servers, worked fine. I might have notes to remind me whether it > was FreeBSD or OpenBSD. > > What I'm curious about is which *BSD has good APCI support? I do want my > laptop to act like a laptop. One advantage of Commercial distros - Ubuntu > and RedHat - is they test new big brand laptops early. (OTOH I really > prefer older Lenovos now, so maybe that matters less for me now?) Or should > I give up and embrace Darwin/BSD (aka MacOSX) for the laptop? OpenBSD's ACPI support is interesting, because they wrote their own ACPI code whereas FreeBSD (and everyone else?) uses the reference implementation from Intel: https://www.freebsd.org/projects/acpi/ https://man.openbsd.org/acpi.4 I'd guess OpenBSD would work well on your older Lenovos, since that seems a popular choice of people on the mailing lists, but perhaps not immediatly on the newer laptops for the reason you name. The perception out there may be that OpenBSD is for servers not laptops, but their developers don't think that way: https://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/openbsd-laptops My own experience is pretty limited since I've only tried it on two laptops in the last 10 years or so. It works great on an Asus Z35Fm (from 2006) but last I tried had sound and X problems on an HP Elitebook 8440 (from 2010). Best to avoid NVidia video cards if you might end up wanting to run OpenBSD. That's a big problem with that second machine, and the usual response on the mailing lists to people having a bad time is that few developers have the time to figure out Nvidia cards, what with there being no decent developer documentation, so don't buy their stuff. Though I think someone in NetBSD or maybe even DragonFlyBSD is working on porting the Nouveau drivers over, so maybe someday someone from OpenBSD will take that in. OpenBSD's kernel now imports Linux code for AMD/ATI and Intel video cards, but not NVidia's. Also, while I don't run it myself so have no first hand impressions, a couple of French developers do a lot of work to make sure recent Gnome runs well. There is or was apparently a large multinational using Gnome on OpenBSD as the desktop environment for some large swath of their users. -- Mike Small smallm at sdf.org
- References:
- [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- From: smallm at sdf.org (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- From: sillystring at protonmail.com (Eric Chadbourne)
- [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- Next by Date: [Discuss] PGP/GPG and S/MIME Vulnerability
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- Next by thread: [Discuss] I Hate Ubuntu
- Index(es):