BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Subject: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: bill at horne.net (Bill Horne)
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 13:20:40 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20180624033526.GC14373@bladeshadow.org>
- References: <3387a575-3c13-0e54-a485-6c2dabffcda0@thekramers.net> <20180624033526.GC14373@bladeshadow.org>
On 6/23/2018 11:35 PM, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 04:26:14AM -0400, David Kramer wrote: >> My main motivations for running my own mail server is that I rely >> heavily on procmail rules to deliver mail to the right folders, and >> I am also not crazy about third parties scanning and storing all my >> mail, though that's negotiable. > I'm in pretty much this situation, but I've kind of given up on the > idea that no one should be able to read my e-mail. The fact is your > e-mail is already being consumed by the great government surveillance > machine regardless, since both incoming and outgoing mail has to > traverse multiple ISP backbones (excepting perhaps the case where all > your recipients are on your own server), and only crazy people like me > were ever willing to put up with the hastle of encrypting all their > mail, so... it's a total loss, pretty much. No matter how effective the NSA and the deep state and the man behind the curtain and J. Edgar's ghosts have been at weakening encryption algorithms, it's still a good idea to use end-to-end encryption on any emails that you want to keep private. In the first place, most of the people you want to prevent reading you emails don't have access to any decryption capability, and in the second, even law-enforcement agencies will be forced to get a a warrant (admittedly an easy task) or poison any evidence they gather. Even if you assume that the AES standard has custom-made holes in it for the use of government(s), the "equities" issue is as good a defense as any lawyer: if Uncle Sam introduces decrypted messages as evidence in a trial, then it has ipso facto admitted that it _can_ decrypt them, and thus will have compromised an invaluable source of information and offended some campaign contributors who would like that not to be true. No matter what, end-to-end encryption buys you time: you can't prevent the powers-that-be from obtaining envelope data, but there are ways around that problem, too. Bill -- Bill Horne
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- References:
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: david at thekramers.net (David Kramer)
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Running a mail server, or not
- Index(es):