BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Port Scanning
- Subject: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 21:39:34 -0400
- In-reply-to: <e1589141-299b-423e-8aaa-cf2a0a9a66b4@borg.org>
- References: <5c43eee0-caaf-45d6-8fdb-273cb3d8ea6d@borg.org> <20240801172933.yqcdeki3ntkrrl2t@randomstring.org> <51804f85-9275-4d89-9dc2-86234cdb299b@borg.org> <20240801210627.bzw47tfmyxofcep3@randomstring.org> <82b0d41d-075d-496e-9e1f-ef1529623c38@borg.org> <20240801182824.4bf21319.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <f6d905fd-7886-4cf2-9b02-f6d89f60adf0@borg.org> <20240801214606.5bebc46a.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <20c3240d-184f-4c84-b4ed-7680ac5301bd@borg.org> <CAJFsZ=o7btMacs-OqTB0908ehYkZCFGtupLkNi59C9K8XV6zKQ@mail.gmail.com> <20240804112131.195b6e56.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=roiGszBrbv6CzFY57V=fBe9CnZKqBi-eSUQ8eTHPr8_A@mail.gmail.com> <20240806075246.1247c265.Richard.Pieri@gmail.com> <30f00649fdfd89126d760f2d9f105c96.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <e1589141-299b-423e-8aaa-cf2a0a9a66b4@borg.org>
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 16:31:29 -0700 Kent Borg <kentborg at borg.org> wrote: > C/C++ compilers are more mature, so there are better optimizers for > C/C++ programmers. This is an advantage for C. Though, not always: > sometimes the machine code will simply be as fast as it possible, and > sometimes Rust will be that fast, making it a wash. But on average, > at least for the moment, C/C++ has the advantage. Maybe. Rust is a front end to LLVM which frequently generates faster binaries than GCC. Not always, but frequently. This puts Rust in a very good place. And it's only going to get better. Oh. Then there's this. Specifically section 9 under Taking the Plunge. https://bcantrill.dtrace.org/2018/09/18/falling-in-love-with-rust/ -- \m/ (--) \m/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- References:
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Port Scanning
- Index(es):