Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

XF86Config Modelines...



     My monitor says "Tandy" on it.  Should I be worried?


______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Re: XF86Config Modelines...
Author:  Kyle Rose <krose at theory.lcs.mit.edu> at InterNet
Date:    4/7/99 8:51 PM


>  KR> This is a huge urban legend.  In the past it may have been true 
>  KR> that attempting to clock a monitor past its specs caused Bad
>  KR> Things(TM), but today, most monitors do the intelligent thing: 
>  KR> lose sync.
> 
> I agree that most monitors will handle this intelligently rather
> than blow up, but I can assure you that this is NOT an urban legend: 
> I personally set a monitor on fire this way and melted the flyback, 
> although it is true that it was many years ago.  The machine in
> question was a Northgate 12MHz 286, to give you some idea of the 
> time frame.  (And yes, I saved the keyboard.)
     
My point was that the "burning monitor" fear was in the same class as 
the "burned in monitor" fear: it is something that used to be true 
long ago, but it would require you to rummage through a garage sale to 
find such a monitor today.
     
Kyle
     
     
-- 
Kyle R. Rose                      "They can try to bind our arms, 
Laboratory for Computer Science    But they cannot chain our minds 
MIT NE43-309, 617-253-5883             or hearts..." 
http://web.mit.edu/krr/www/                           Stratovarius 
krose at theory.lcs.mit.edu                              Forever Free 
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with 
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the 
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
-------------- next part --------------
Received: from ns.learningco.com ([198.112.0.7]) by mail.learningco.com with
SMTP
  (IMA Internet Exchange 3.11) id 0003C09B; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 21:22:47 -0400
Received: by ns.learningco.com; id VAA28192; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 21:22:26 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from tarnhelm.blu.org(207.31.228.20) by ns.learningco.com via smap
(4.1)
	id xma028112; Wed, 7 Apr 99 21:21:43 -0400
Received: (from majordom at localhost)
	by tarnhelm.blu.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA08187
	for discuss-outgoing; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 20:48:35 -0400
Received: from bigred.lcs.mit.edu (root at bigred.lcs.mit.edu [18.52.0.248])
	by tarnhelm.blu.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA08184
	for <discuss at Blu.Org>; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 20:48:32 -0400
Received: by bigred.lcs.mit.edu
	via sendmail from stdin
	id <m10V32X-002QmgC at bigred.lcs.mit.edu> (Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
	for discuss at Blu.Org; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 20:51:29 -0400 (EDT) 
To: mikebw at bilow.bilow.uu.ids.net
Cc: discuss at Blu.Org
Subject: Re: XF86Config Modelines...
References: <70bcd9c5 at bilow.bilow.uu.ids.net>
From: Kyle Rose <krose at theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 07 Apr 1999 20:51:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: mikebw at bilow.bilow.uu.ids.net's message of "Wed, 07 Apr 99 22:41:00
-0000"
Message-ID: <871zhwaq9a.fsf at bigred.lcs.mit.edu>
Lines: 26
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
Sender: owner-discuss at blu.org
Precedence: bulk



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org