Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

6.1 and Samba (beaten again by new technologies)



Hello,
	Why not just get the source and tailor what you need for yourself.
Getting Samba up and running from source has to be easier than this post.
I was able to get it running from source, and if I can do it - any one
can.  Then you just need to change where your init scripts look for the
executables. Its really easy, it shouldn't take more than 30 minutes on a
fairly recent machine.

Anthony

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Niall Kavanagh wrote:

> Yet another guess... are you sure the daemons are even running? Check on the
> "status" page of SWAT to make sure. I wasted about 20mins banging my
> gigantic head against a very hard wall last week because of this. Samba was
> installed by 6.1, but wasn't set to start up with the system. ;)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Donnelly [mailto:gimli at offcenter.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 3:16 PM
> To: Derek Martin
> Cc: Kevin M. Gleason; BLU Discussion Group
> Subject: Re: 6.1 and Samba (beaten again by new technologies)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Derek Martin wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Kevin M. Gleason wrote:
> > 
> > > know works OK with Samba and the newer version which will be supported
> > > longer by RH. SWAT no longer works with 6.1 and smb files are missing...
> > 
> > Huh?  Unless I'm a lot more tired than I thought I was, I was just using
> > SWAT under RH 6.1 the other day on my laptop.  What do you mean when you
> > say it doesn't work?
> 
> I'd guess instead that Kevin had initially gotten SAMBA to work by
> installing from scratch, and then had upgraded it via an RPM.
> Unfortunately, these two methods install to wildly different places!
> 
> So, I would -again guess - that Kevin's SWAT displays and configures
> things, but that it doesn't actually *do* anything, because it's altering
> all the wrong files.
> 
> As for the smb files being missing, which ones are they?  I'd guess that
> they're there, just in different places.  Try running this command:
> 
> rpm -l samba (optionally with a "| less")
> 
> This will list out all the files that the samba rpm installs, including
> any configuration files that come with it.  Does it have any in /etc?  Are
> they there?
> 
> Hey, this is just a guess.  Am I right?
> --Mark
> 
> -
> Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
> "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
> message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
> -
> Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
> "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
> message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
> 

-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).




BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org