Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Yea, clustering the two cisco's into one virtual box would work as well. As Derek says, you'd have to share one IP address. -derek "Derek D. Martin" <ddm at pizzashack.org> writes: > At some point hitherto, Derek Atkins hath spake thusly: > > You need to use dynamic routing on the client. Look at gated. > > That's an option, but also many Cisco products have failover > capabilities built into them. IOW you can link them together, and the > secondary will automatically take over for the primary if it fails. > The IP of the gateway will float between them, and generally they'll > each have their own IP as well. > > IMO this is the better way to solve the problem, because you don't > have to worry about (re)configuring dozens or hundreds of clients > correctly to deal with the redundancy. Just point them all at your > one gateway IP, and let the routers do the rest. > > -- > Derek Martin ddm at pizzashack.org > --------------------------------------------- > I prefer mail encrypted with PGP/GPG! > GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D > Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu > Learn more about it at http://www.gnupg.org > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |