Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 1 May 2003 10:47:09 -0400 (EDT) "Anthony J. Gabrielson" <agabriel at home.tzo.org> wrote: > I would argue that by having to take this step now they already have > lost and are grasping for straws. If they lose this, they will prob > be gone soon. The SCO business business plan is flawed and I haven't > seen much from them lately. > > Whats SCO done for the market lately? There in almost as bad of shape > as SGI. IMHO, SCO has never done anything positive for the Unix/Linux communities. Xenix (which was originally Microsoft) was horrible. Their System V was somewhat non-standard. We ran Xenix for a short time at the old BCS until we found a much more stable listserv for MS-DOS. I had the occasion to install SCO System V on my PC also. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030501/675b7138/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |