SCO Unix Intellectual Property Pedigree Chart

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

On Thu, 1 May 2003 10:47:09 -0400 (EDT)
"Anthony J. Gabrielson" <agabriel at home.tzo.org> wrote:

> I would argue that by having to take this step now they already have
> lost and are grasping for straws.  If they lose this, they will prob
> be gone soon.  The SCO business business plan is flawed and I haven't
> seen much from them lately.
> 
> Whats SCO done for the market lately?  There in almost as bad of shape
> as SGI.
IMHO, SCO has never done anything positive for the Unix/Linux
communities. Xenix (which was originally Microsoft) was horrible. Their
System V was somewhat non-standard. We ran Xenix for a short time at the
old BCS until we found a much more stable listserv for MS-DOS. I had the
occasion to install SCO System V on my PC also.  
-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030501/675b7138/attachment.sig>