Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Monday 14 January 2008, Fred wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 09:53 -0500, Mark Woodward wrote: > > > If you guys are going to do this for real, someone should provide 2 > > > sets of identical hardware and OS. We should also invite the MySQL > > > Meetup.com (http://mysql.meetup.com/137/) group. > > > > I don't see why we need two sets of hardware. One computer running the > > test one after the other. There is nothing more identical than "same." > > I think it should be 2 identical systems for the following reason: The > placement on the hard drives of the data could alter the outcome of the > tests, especially if there's fragmentation and the like. > > 2 Identical freshly-installed systems, and the FS settings should be > tuned on both machines to max performance, like noatime, commit=60, etc. > > Or it could be one system, but the system should be reinstalled afresh > between tests.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |