Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Bill Horne wrote: > Tom Metro wrote: >> Of course the spam argument doesn't really apply to blocking inbound >> port 25. > > Seen from the perspective of a network manager, it _does_ apply: there > are thousands of business and home users whose machines are set up to > receive email on port 25 by default, and when those uses get spam, they > call Comcast and complain. If blocking inbound traffic to port 25 avoids > paying for a staff to handle those complaints, then the manager's choice > is simple.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |