BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

1234567890 - time_t party?

Subject: 1234567890 - time_t party?
From: dougsweetser-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Doug)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:09:45 -0500
In-reply-to: <f323b5930901191353l1548b046ud179e2389fdc71b5-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References: <f323b5930901191353l1548b046ud179e2389fdc71b5@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:53 PM, John Abreau <jabr-iwcNaMm7aMIiq3RsQ1AnAw at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> It's been brought to my attention that the clock value 1234567890
> corresponds to
> Fri 13 Feb 2009 06:31:30 PM EST.  Perhaps a time_t party would be in order,
> maybe at the CBC?

You get good luck by killing the cat with shards from a broken mirror.

Doug
Note: such an act is both illegal and immoral,
so may no longer be possible in the next administration.

References:
- 1234567890 - time_t party?
  - From: jabr-iwcNaMm7aMIiq3RsQ1AnAw at public.gmane.org (John Abreau)

Prev by Date: 1234567890 - time_t party?
Next by Date: samba share setup on linux clients
Previous by thread: 1234567890 - time_t party?
Next by thread: 1234567890 - time_t party?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org