The end is near for SCO (hopefully)

[j.natowitz-KealBaEQdz4 at public.gmane.org (Jerry Natowitz)]

Putting aside the unrepentantly sleazy nature of SCO's management, does 
anyone feel at least a tiny bit sad about the passing of SCO?

I have a college buddy who made a good living in the early 90s selling 
SCO-based POS systems that supported up to 150 serial terminals on a 
single x86 box.  Yes, GNU/Linux and Solaris would be able to do the 
same, but not for a number of years.



	Jerry Natowitz
	j.natowitz-KealBaEQdz4 at public.gmane.org


Jerry Feldman wrote:
> U.S. Trustee Moves to Convert SCO Bankruptcy to Chapter 7
> http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2009050519075131
> 
> Basically there is still some litigation such as the SCO vs. IBM, SCO 
> vs. Novell appeal, and a couple of others. As PJ states, a chapter 7 
> does not end the litigation, but essentially changes the management of 
> SCO.  Both of these cases have an affect on SCO's assets, so even if SCO 
> is liquidated, the lawsuits could be carried forward.
> 
> The reason I monitor this is that both of these cases have an affect on 
> Linux. Had SCO been successful, Linux could have been in serious trouble.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss