Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Greg Rundlett wrote: > Linux Journal recently did an article about OpenFiler > The article is available only to subscribers... It'll eventually get published on the public site. I skimmed it in the print edition. It was mostly a how-to, which you can probably find elsewhere. > Plus, a lot of hits out there comparing with FreeNAS > e.g. http://www.scribd.com/doc/29643/OpenFiler-vs-FreeNAS The author of that comparison concludes that OpenFiler generally performs better, and being a more complete distribution (that includes debugging tools) is easier to administer. But it's two years old, and I think FreeNAS is now available in a more complete form than just the 32 MB version he used. He also makes no mention of ZFS (which wasn't available then), instead using UFS for the file system, which could have negatively impacted performance. ZFS is perhaps the most compelling reason to use FreeNAS. I haven't found OpenFiler to be all that interesting, mostly because it is RedHat derived, and almost everything I work with these days is Debian derived, but also because it seems to offer only a small incremental benefit over using a general purpose Linux distribution. No new file systems and not slimmed down as much as FreeNAS (which can translate to lower costs if you're loading the OS onto a Flash card). Eventually there will be some other options: Nexenta Systems sells a commercial NAS OS that I've read is based on a OpenSolaris kernel (w/ZFS) and Linux user space (don't know which, if any, distribution it resembles). They provide a 30-day trial, but if they're GPL compliant, at least some of that code should be available unencumbered. (Perhaps the OpenSolaris license permits them to keep the kernel proprietary.) There's a project to combine the FreeBSD kernel with Debian user space: http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7295 http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_why Most of the above is all about getting around the license restrictions on Sun's ZFS. (There's a FUSE implementation of ZFS for Linux, but it isn't practical for a production NAS, and possibly never will be.) There's also the more direct approach, BTRFS, the Linux answer to ZFS, as contributed by Oracle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Btrfs http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7308 So hopefully we'll eventually see a Debian-derived, compact NAS distribution featuring one of the leading-edge fie system technologies. -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |