Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:46:32PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Dan Ritter<dsr-mzpnVDyJpH4k7aNtvndDlA at public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > I've been looking at cluster filesystems over iSCSI and AoE, and > > on moderate hardware, performance appears to be execrable. > > Anyone around have experience with this sort of thing? > > > > For a simple example, I have: > > > > - a network that I can measure 93 MB/s across > > > - a disk that I can measure 74 MB/s reading > > - a best-case ext3 over AoE of 41 MB/s > > It seems to me that you are adding both network and filesystem > overhead here. I just ran some quick 'dd's and I get similar > performance drops between direct reads of /dev/sd* and reads of large > files locally from an ext3 filesystem. Interestingly, > I have another partition on the same disk formated as a XFS > filesystem and local reads of a large file from that filesystem > gave me around 70 MB/s. You might try AoE with XFS rather then ext3 > and see what you get. I can get 73MB/s reading off the ext3 filesystem, so that's not it. In any case, I don't actually want ext3 or xfs; I'm going to need a cluster-aware filesystem. -dsr- -- http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. You can't defend freedom by getting rid of it.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |