 |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
|
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I was told that fsck is much faster than on ext3. This dovetails with the faster boot initiatives. Randy -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 7:35 AM To: Boston Linux and Unix <discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: to ext4 or not... On 06/21/2009 05:33 PM, Stephen Adler wrote: > Do you see any performance improvements at all? > I have not noticed any, but I'm not doing any performance-related tasks. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
 |
|
| BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
| We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. | |
