Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Judging external HD reliability



On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:21:30AM -0600, Jack-rp9/bkPP+cDYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org wrote:
> When working for a bank, we built our own 'NAS Server' by putting a hardware
> RAID card and as many and the biggest drives we could afford.  The servers
> didn't need a LOT of CPU but memory always helped.  We did use 1G NICs.
> And yes, we still backed it up to a tape backup system.  These were used
> for low performance NAS needs (storing check images at 200bpi and PDFs
> of statements).
> 
> It worked and was cheap.  The highest $$ single component was the Adaptec
> RAID card, but it works.  Also use software to monitor your RAID and its
> drives, because things do fail.  And buy a spare drive whether you keep it in
> or not.

I am now totally enamored of the HP P800 controller. It is unfortunately
expensive, but it is totally awesome in a hardware sense. Good Linux
drivers in-kernel, and an external monitoring program called cpqarrayd
available on Sourceforge.

-dsr-



-- 
http://tao.merseine.nu/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference.
You can't defend freedom by getting rid of it.






BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org