Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 05/03/2010 06:54 PM, Derek Martin wrote: > On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 12:54:33PM -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote: > =20 >> On 05/02/2010 12:30 PM, Kurt Keville wrote: >> =20 >>> Can you do it by aliasing the interface? >>> >>> http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-mini/IP-Alias.html#SETTINGUPMAIL >>> >>> =20 >> I looked at things like that especially DAEMON_OPTIONS. I'd prefer tha= t >> sendmail listen on all interfaces (lo, eth0, and eth1), but only send = on >> lo and eth0. >> =20 > FWIW, I don't think this is possible without doing odd things to your > routing, and it probably wouldn't make much sense anyway. Otherwise, > I believe sendmail would receive connections on eth1, and then reply > out of... which interface? The process which initiated the connection > would likely receive responses from a different IP than it was > connected to (if at all, depending on the routing), and quite possibly > ignore them. I suspect this is the problem you're already having, > only in reverse. > > =20 I think the issue was that John set the default route to the new Interface. and sendmail started to use the default route (duh). --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |