Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
---- Believe it or not, SCO isn't dead yet. SCO Group, by its lawyers Boies Schiller & Flexner and Hatch & Dodge, has just asked the US District Court for the District of Utah to reopen <http://www.groklaw.net/pdf3/IBM-1095.pdf> [PDF] its litigation against IBM: SCO respectfully moves the Court to reopen this case in order to proceed with SCO?s unfair competition claim concerning the Project Monterey joint venture and with SCO?s tortious interference claims alleging that IBM interfered with SCO?s market position and business relationships. Its reasons are in the redacted Memorandum in Support [update: SCO has once again filed an inadequately redacted document, so I've pulled the PDF until they replace it], so some of it is for the court's eyes only. But it's about two claims, evidently, "the Project Monterey joint venture (the 'Project Monterey Claim') and with SCO?s tortious interference claims alleging that IBM interfered with SCO?s market and business relationships": The Project Monterey Claim and the Tortious Interference Claims are unaffected by the final judgment entered in /SCO v. Novell/, Civil No. 2:04CV139 (the ?Novell Litigation?), which the Tenth Circuit has now affirmed. This Court need not await the resolution of that litigation, because it has ended. I gather this means they won't be appealing the /SCO v. Novell/ decision, the deadline for which is November 28th, I believe. And it's not asking to reopen SCO's claims exactly, except via two IBM summary judgement motions, while leaving the rest of IBM's claims frozen in limbo. It's not the first time <http://groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100807112235763> SCO tried this. But who exactly is "The SCO Group" nowadays? ---- Remember that TSCOG is still under chapter 11 even though they are virtually out of business and have sold their assets to UnXis. The really good thing here is that it appears they are not going to appeal -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |