Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > ...here is the output of /proc/cpuinfo: > model name : AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor > cpu MHz : 3120.331 > cache size : 2048 KB > siblings : 8 > cpu cores : 4 http://www.richweb.com/cpu_info If the number of cores = the number of siblings for a given physical processor, then hyperthreading is OFF. I didn't think AMD did Hyperthreading... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulldozer_%28microarchitecture%29 ...by eliminating some of the "redundant" elements that naturally creep into multicore designs, AMD has hoped to take better advantage of its hardware capabilities, while using less power. So does that mean it isn't just L2 cache or FPU that's being shared among cores, but other more significant components of the CPU, which, like Hyperthreading, are more likely to result in thread contention? Be interesting to see some sort of a VM benchmark compared between this CPU and an Intel equivalent. > I'm not feeling the love from Ubuntu 12.04. Anyone have a good distro that > uses gnome 2 and the 3.x linux kernel? After looking at Mint w/Mate, Cinnamon, and Gnome 3 fallback, and Ubuntu 11.10 w/Unity, Cinnamon, and Gnome 3 fallback, my bet is that Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with an alternate desktop (Cinnamon or Gnome 3 fallback) is going to offer the best blend of stability and software support. (I was intending to write up a post with my experiences evaluating Mint and 11.10 with the various desktops, but didn't get to it while all the details were fresh in my mind. The overarching impression was that the differences among the desktops was far less dramatic and more superficial than one would expect from the way they are described in articles and user comments. They pretty much all had the same elements, just with the deck chairs rearranged. If you don't happen to be picky about your desktop setup, any one of them would likely work fine. The most annoying attribute of the newest desktops is an inability to customize the appearance - rearrange the panels, tweak the window decorations, etc. - and Unity seemed to be the most locked down. Though didn't I see recently that there is some Unity config tool available for 12.04? What I can say is that neither Unity or Cinnamon properly handled my multiple monitor setup. I think I achieved the closest emulation of GNOME 2 using Gnome 3 fallback. I need to run another round of tests with the 12.04 beta.) -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |