Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] LVM vs File system file for KVM Virtual Machines?



I'm in the LVM-is-better camp, and don't have a whole lot to add given that
the major points have been addressed.

But here's one suggestion I've always given to people who work with me: 
rather than leaving it to hearsay, run your own benchmarks.  VMs are cheap, so
build two and run your favorite benchmarks to see if you can measure a
difference.

Don't know of one?  Try this one, it's a trusty easy-to-compile standby:
http://sysbench.sourceforge.net/

I found that with Virtualbox running under a Linux 2.6 host, LVM was
substantially faster than bare metal (hard to explain other than that there is
some write-through caching going on at the host O/S level).

-rich





BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org