BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Subject: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 19:35:37 -0400
- In-reply-to: <536801C9.9030407@borg.org>
- References: <5364F3FB.40707@blu.org> <5367AE30.5020205@borg.org> <5367B2A9.3090804@gmail.com> <5367E6E2.7050005@borg.org> <5367EB97.5070501@gmail.com> <536801C9.9030407@borg.org>
Kent Borg wrote: > Scenario 1: Horrible noise comes from one disk and it quits working. > Desire: Go back in time to just before the horrible noise. > Solution: RAID works great, in fact you are already forward of point and > still running. (Order a new disk.) Please explain how having one disk that still works does anything to ensure the integrity of the data on it. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Is Sharp AL-1540CS a paperweight on Linux
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Is Sharp AL-1540CS a paperweight on Linux
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Index(es):
