BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Subject: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 09:31:03 -0400
- In-reply-to: <201405061313.s46DDWek010975@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net>
- References: <5364F3FB.40707@blu.org> <5367AE30.5020205@borg.org> <65397498e62c47bdb922195a82122a46@CO2PR04MB684.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <5368DE98.9070303@borg.org> <201405061313.s46DDWek010975@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net>
On 05/06/2014 09:13 AM, Robert Krawitz wrote: > Disks themselves have clever proprietary firmware... Indeed. But, judging from lost data reputations, they appear to be careful in what they ship. Also, when doing RAID 1, I like to pair disks from different manufacturers. Different models and manufacturing dates help when one runs out of distinct manufacturers. -kb, the Kent who worries that we are running out of distinct disk manufacturers.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- References:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Index(es):
