BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Subject: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 07:20:42 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53888E45.3030400@gmail.com>
- References: <217800c70e2414f199ab891a6d6db058.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <5387A861.5070708@gmail.com> <5387CAA6.3010905@gmail.com> <53886781.5010107@blu.org> <53888E45.3030400@gmail.com>
Agreed. We now have 2 Open Source office products competing with Microsoft and eachother. On 05/30/2014 09:57 AM, Richard Pieri wrote: > Jerry Feldman wrote: >> OpenOffice was given to Apache 2 years ago. > Yes, two years /after/ the Document Foundation forked LibreOffice over > Oracle's stewardship of OpenOffice. As I wrote before, I point at > Oracle's assumption of ownership of OpenOffice as an example of what can > go wrong. > -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- References:
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Boston Linux and Unix InstallFest LII today, Saturday May 31, 2014
- Next by Date: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?
- Index(es):
