[Discuss] TrueCrypt EOL, what's next?

[richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)]

Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote:
> I have been searching for people on the net that have the source, and
> so far, haven't been satisfied.

The archive at GRC appears to be correct. While I do not have a copy of
earlier source code I do have version 7.1a binaries which GPG says are
valid based on the GPG key provided. Since the signatures match I am
reasonably confident that the same key was used to sign my old files and
the files hosted at GRC. And since GPG also verifies the source files at
GRC as being signed with the same key I am reasonably confident that the
source archive is genuine.

Also, the source zip from GRC has the same MD5 and SHA1 checksums as
your source zip on Dropbox so I'm reasonably confident that they are
identical.

-- 
Rich P.