[Discuss] Using a good TV as a monitor

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

That us correct. It is more of a space issue. I probably would not like
it because my 24in monitor is nice.

On 06/22/2014 10:25 PM, Shirley M?rquez D?lcey wrote:
> If I were buying one for the purpose I'd certainly want to go to at
> least 1080p and perhaps higher. But I think Jerry was proposing to use
> a TV he already owns, and if so it's likely to be a 720p set because
> the majority of 32" sets are that resolution.
>
> Aside from the resolution issue and the inability to send audio to the
> TV, it's easy to do and should work well. All you need is a DVI to
> HDMI cable, or an appropriate DVI to HDMI adapter at either end of the
> connection. I have tried it, and also gone in the other direction -
> connecting things with HDMI outputs to my DVI monitors.
>
> Another useful conversion is HDMI to VGA so I can connect new devices
> to my old analog-only data projector; I have an inexpensive converter
> for that. That involves digital to analog conversion so it's not
> lossless like the DVI to HDMI connection but it works well enough.
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:47 PM, John Abreau <abreauj at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I find that even 1080 feels crowded for a vertical resolution. I really
>> hated it when the industry essentially abandoned 1920x1200 in favor of
>> 1920x1080 for laptop displays.
>>
>> If I were in the market for a new monitor/hdtv, I'd go for a reasonably
>> large 4K display. A 55-inch display with a resolution of 3840x2160 would be
>> a great replacement for the 28-inch 1920x1200 display I currently use.
>>
>> Amazon currently sells one of these, the Seiki SE55UY04 55-Inch 120Hz LED 4k
>> UHD TV, for $699.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Shirley M?rquez D?lcey <mark at buttery.org>
>> wrote:
>>> DVI to HDMI is a simple passive adapter; the digital signals for the
>>> video are identical. DVI doesn't pass audio, so if you plan to use the
>>> speakers in the TV you will have to get the audio there some other
>>> way. Aside from that it should work perfectly, though a 32" TV is
>>> likely to only be 720p.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> wrote:
>>>> I am moving to a new home, and I was considering using a Samsung 32" TV
>>>> as an alternative screen. One drawback is that my computer does not have
>>>> HDMI, but that is a minor issue.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
>>>> Boston Linux and Unix
>>>> PGP key id:3BC1EB90
>>>> PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66  C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>> Discuss at blu.org
>>>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at blu.org
>>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix
>> Email: abreauj at gmail.com / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6
>> PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23  C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id:3BC1EB90 
PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66  C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90