BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Subject: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: invalid at pizzashack.org (Derek Martin)
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 12:30:20 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAFv2jcbnt1FRNnX9=SXfY4mfaHauup2P2RzayxhKzHX6XUsetA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CALggPSnKM8sz3kAWQUwOMSgzpKMEQSxtzaeU6FfYN2H6H7vBpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFv2jcbnt1FRNnX9=SXfY4mfaHauup2P2RzayxhKzHX6XUsetA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:52:55PM -0400, John Abreau wrote: > If a key has been stripped of all traces of the owner's identity, I don't > see how it would be possible to adequately verify trust of that key during > the keysigning party. Or when you are sending them e-mail. Or at any other time. Positive identification of the recipient is generally part of what is required, so that you do not, say, encrypt company secrets to your competitor, instead of your coworker, for example. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: m.m.rajwadkar at ieee.org (Mayuresh Rajwadkar)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- References:
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: m.m.rajwadkar at ieee.org (Mayuresh Rajwadkar)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Next by Date: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Next by thread: [Discuss] privacy with pgp keys
- Index(es):