Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:37:00AM -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I back up my wife's Windows system every night using rsync over SMBFS. > Lately, I am getting messages such as: > readlink WINDOWS/FONTS/TT0084M_.TTF: Too many open files in system That's almost certainly coming from the Linux side. > This has only started to occur. I am using rsync version 2.5.6 with > protocol version 26. I am using samba 2.2.7a-72 and a 2.4.20 kernel. I'd guess Samba isn't closing files quickly enough after you touch them - no idea why. Rsync is a great backup solution, but I think a move to a different protocol would be a help. You could run an rsync server on the Linux box and use the native rsync protocol, or tunnel rsync through rsh or ssh - either one would take Samba out of the loop. Here's how it might look in ssh (assuming something like a cygwin bash shell): RSYNC_RSH=ssh rsync [...all your usual options...] /windoz/wifecdrive wifeuserid at mylinuxhost:/path/to/backup/directory You can set up cert-based ssh authentication for that account that'll let this work without having to type a password, if that's desirable. Nathan > I'm not sure at this point if the open files limit is the Linux limit of > 1024 or a limit on the Windows system or SMBFS. > > My thoughts are at this point is some issue with rsync either > paralleling itself or not closing files after copy in some > circumstances. > > My option on the command are: > rsync -auv --exclude-from=exclude_file --delete-excluded > /windoz/wifecdrive /backup/wifecdrive > > I have a lot of excluded files (such as cache, temp, Windows swap). > > BTW: The reason I use rsync is that a tar file would be huge. I ran into > that where it got so large that stat failed, and I had difficulty > deleting it. Also, a large tar file would be difficult to restore a > single file. > > > - -- > Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> > Boston Linux and Unix user group > http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 > PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/r6KM+wA+1cUGHqkRAqbIAJkBQuWfqidDqp44eUpSn2Yj6gnwIwCdHN21 > gn4e5dNkxy9j8JCCsj+1Ycg= > =W9mc > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > --
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |