Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Jerry Feldman wrote: > I think what is important is not how they market it, but how they > package (maybe define is a better term) it to the regulators. From my I'm reminded of the discussion over iPad as appliance vs. computer. What the technology is takes a back seat to how the vendor describes it to the audience. iPad isn't a computer; it's "a truly magical and revolutionary product". FiOS isn't a telecommunications system; it's a TV and broadband service. PlayStation 4 isn't four netbooks glommed together; it's the most powerful video game console evar. > The legal problem is that the laws are archaic and have not really > caught up to the technology. Every city and town wants a piece of the > action, but in reality these services should be regulated both at the > state and federal level. I tend to agree as elaborated somewhat in my previous post in the other fork of this discussion. The FCC seems to think that this is anti-competitive and bad for consumers. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |