Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> Joseph Guarino wrote: >> With the greatest respect I have to disagree. Your current >> understanding of Marketing is biased to say the least. Marketing is the >> art/science of communicating value to customers. There is nothing > > [snrk] > > Marketing is neither art nor science. It's the process of selling > things. "Communicating value to customers" is corpspeak for advertising. Marketing and advertising are very similar and there is a great deal of overlap, but there are important differences. It is marketing to say: "Hey, we can use our product to cure cancer! That's a great market." It is advertising to say "What color should the bikini be?" Sometimes "corpspeak" is a good thing. It isn't always about deception, many times it is about communication. Some ideas have negative connotations, sometimes it is best to create a new word or phrase. It can be deceptive, sure, like all things, but it doesn't have to be. > > Corpspeak is fuzzy. It's ambiguous. It's used when you don't want to > tell it straight and you don't want to lie outright. You may not be > conscious of doing it. You may hold the best intentions. The fact > remains: you used fuzzy, ambiguous jargon instead of plain English to > try to sell me something. This demonstrates my statement: marketing is > inherently unethical. > > Where you or I or anyone else draws a line for what is acceptable > practice in marketing? That's an orthogonal issue. > > -- > Rich P. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |