BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Reading Linux book
- Subject: [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:12:34 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53337FF9.1080303@gmail.com>
- References: <1395861029.5444.YahooMailNeo@web122205.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1395861296.78694.YahooMailNeo@web122204.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <53337251.404@borg.org> <53337FF9.1080303@gmail.com>
There doesn't seem to be a lot of controversy that a separate /boot partition is good. On 03/26/2014 09:33 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > Regarding partition layouts, I don't bother with them any more beyond > a small /boot partition. All other file systems are under some kind of > volume manager that permits dynamic allocation and sizing. I like having a different /home partition so that I will have more flexibility with future OS installs. Assumption: Upgrades are technically hard to engineer and even harder to thoroughly test, and my starting condition before I do my upgrade will probably not be a tested case. The more that I want an OS upgrade to work (because I have done a lot of custom configuring I don't want to have to redo) the less likely it will be to work correctly (because I have made a lot of custom configuring). This is why I always maintain a file called adminlog.txt. It is my notes, an old fashioned journal with dated entries of what I do to the OS. If I need to reproduce my config, I can "replay" this journal. So, for OS upgrades I do a fresh, complete install. Having an OS partition means I can install there, without touching my /home partition. If it works, I can then tweak things to use my old /home partition. Yes, there can be upgrade problems for home directories, too, but not blowing away all my files is a nice start. Another partition consideration: Disks are cheap, on some of my machines I have dual "/" partitions for the OS, each complete and bootable. One is a trailing copy the other and I can revert to it by a simple reboot. When I have been running happily and some updates come along, I copy my running version over to the other side before the update--so I can again again revert if anything goes wrong. This might be overly conservative and paranoid on the part of a dilettante (and I don't configure things this way always), but I have seen Linux computers where the Professional sysadmins don't do upgrades at all because they don't want to break things that are working. I suggest they have too much faith in the magical abilities of firewalls. -kb
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: dbarrett at blazemonger.com (Daniel Barrett)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- References:
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: aldo_albanese at yahoo.com (aldo albanese)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: aldo_albanese at yahoo.com (aldo albanese)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Linux file systems
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Linux file systems
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Reading Linux book
- Index(es):