Boston Linux & UNIX was originally founded in 1994 as part of The Boston Computer Society. We meet on the third Wednesday of each month, online, via Jitsi Meet.

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives



On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Richard Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bill Bogstad wrote:
>> And checksums can be incorrectly generated/verified by any hardware
>> at any time.I claim that 100% data integrity is impossible. I don't
>> think even ZFS can guarantee 100% data integrity with the right set
>> of bizarre hardware failures in the CPU/RAM of the computer.
>
> ZFS and Btrfs can guarantee 100% data integrity when writes are atomic
> (drives honor sync commands) and ECC RAM is in use and sufficient
> redundant data is available for reconstruction when errors are detected.
> I leave it to the reader to read the ZFS and Btrfs whitepapers that
> explain precisely why they can make these guarantees.

ECC is not 100%.   Nor does it protect against transient CPU/memory
cache errors during
checksum computation.  If you are saying that ZFS can then I will happily read
any whitepaper that you like bcause they are doing some kind of awesome.

Bill Bogstad



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org