BLU Discuss list archive

[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd

Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:21:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <li6zje687ex.fsf@panix5.panix.com>
References: <5411058F.6010208@gmail.com> <20140911113221.GE13278@randomstring.org> <5411AADE.2020302@gmail.com> <CAAbKA3XN6MdTz6qEs=xcxKegZSf4beEZ_GFVAOuCDHZ3PnPN7w@mail.gmail.com> <li6zje687ex.fsf@panix5.panix.com>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Mike Small <smallm at panix.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't call Slackware fringe. Maybe that's just me.

Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
  - From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)

References:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
  - From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
  - From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
  - From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
  - From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.