BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:59:58 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20140911113221.GE13278@randomstring.org>
- References: <5411058F.6010208@gmail.com> <20140911113221.GE13278@randomstring.org>
On 9/11/2014 7:32 AM, Dan Ritter wrote: > . systemd does not play well with others Minor correction: systemd does not play /at all/ with others. It is exclusive, thus proprietary, to the Linux API. Which doesn't say much good about software with hard dependencies on systemd. Like, say, GNOME 3.8 and forward. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- References:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Index(es):